Send an Email
Favourite Sites
  • Whitney Tilson
  • Recommended Booklist

  • Favourite Blogs
  • Calculated Risk
  • Reflections on Value Investing
  • "The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" - John Maynard Keynes

    Thursday, January 11, 2007


    2007 Outlook

    I’ve been thinking about my forecast for this year. At the highest level I believe that market neutral is a great idea for the next 12 months. There is a good chance that the US will see a recession this year and a great chance that we will see a quarter or two between negative 2% and 0% growth.  Of course a recession is an aggregate measure of the performance of the economy and many sectors can perform reasonably well while a few perform terribly, this bifurcation will be the hallmark of the recession or at best very low growth (VLG) period. Credit spread expansion is probably the low risk high reward trade of the next 12 months but I'm not planning on making the trade.

    Commodities are going to perform incredibly well over the next 5 years but the next 1 year could on balance see a period where prices end the year little changed or even moderately down from here (which is significantly down from their highs, especially oil, silver, gold and copper). Throughout this forecast you can measure commodities by looking at Silver, Gold, Oil, Coal and Uranium as these are the ones that I have a position in.

    You can obviously sell all these holdings but I have decided not to for two reasons. Firstly because of an event that will happen coincident with the recession/ VLG scenario. Bernake will flood the system with liquidity because he doesn’t want our hosing bust to turn out like Japan. This will be wildly bullish for commodities and the exact timing of it is very hard to predict. This will be the setup for the next big leg up in commodity bull market. Secondly selling the holdings would incur significant tax payments.

    I plan on implementing this with a mixture of QQQQ (Nasdaq 100) puts and keeping my long positions. Probably on a 2:1 short for long basis as the beta of my longs is at least double that of my shorts. The danger of a market neutral strategy is both sides of the trading going against you. The worst possible scenario would be good tech performance and poor commodity performance. This is very unlikely but possible. At least on the QQQQ side I’ve used options so I can only loose the premium which was very cheap about 8% of my equity for equal net beta coverage.

    The best scenario for the year would be terrible tech performance and great commodity performance; a scenario which is somewhat realistic given that the BRICS (Brazil, India, China, South Korea) economic growth will not necessarily moderate and even if it does, as long as it’s not negative then their consumption in ’07 will be greater than last years.

    The consensus forecast for this year is the Goldilocks forecast with moderating but still significant economic growth leading into a reacceleration in the later half of the year. While I’d loose on my puts, my commodity heavy portfolio will do excellently. The consensus never picks recessions or other turning points and I think they’ve got it wrong.

    I’m looking forward to commodity prices dropping and Nasdaq dropping at the same time. I’m going to try to pick the bottom (which I will fail miserably at) and then sell the puts and buy whatever of my favourite stocks have dropped the most. I’m excited about ending the year in a much better position than I started it.

    It’s worth saying that I’ve though the recession/VLG scenario was possible in late’05 mid ’06 but less likely, hence I had less downside protection. This time around the chance is more than 50/50

    VLG/ Recession scenarios – 70%
    1. Nasdaq up, commodities down – 10%

    2. Nasdaq  down, commodities down (standard recession VLG fare) – 50%

    3. Nasdaq up, commodities up (strong growth resumes by EOY)  – 20%

    4. Nasdaq Down, commodities up (massive reflation)– 20%

    Goldilocks – 30%
    1. Nasdaq up, commodities down -10%

    2. Nasdaq  down, commodities down – 20% (liquidity and/ or growth reduced in BRICS)

    3. Nasdaq up, commodities up (standard fare in global economic synchronised boom- see last 3 years )  – 50%

    4. Nasdaq Down, commodities up – 20%

    I make money on 3, 4, 7 & 8 (50% chance). I stand to loose on 1 & 5 (10% chance).

    2 & 6 (40% chance) are the most interesting because whether I make a little money, breakeven or lose depends on how the Nasdaq compares with commodity prices. I actually think that the Nasdaq 100 has more to loose than commodity stocks because its components are more highly valued and generally technology is deflating while commodity prices are inflating.

    I expect to end the year moderately up and owning more shares of my favourite commodity stocks bought at cheaper prices. I expect to outperform the major indices, I expect to see a lot of volatility (which helps my puts make money) and a year of moderate capital gains.

    Let the year begin!
    Good sir,

    you have neglected to realize that there is at least a 99.75% chance of the pimps up, hoes down scenario. In that scenario, canadian oil sands turn out to contain only sand, there is a worldwide ban on uranium production, and all world currencies move away from coinage and select shares of ZIXI as their preferred currency. And you get to slap-a-ho.


    the devil
    Post a Comment

    << Home


    April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   November 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   September 2004   October 2004   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   December 2005   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   January 2007   December 2007   February 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   April 2009   May 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   January 2010   February 2010   April 2010   July 2010   August 2010   October 2010   November 2010   January 2011   February 2011   April 2011   June 2011  

    Disclaimer and Disclosure Analyses are prepared from sources and data believed to be reliable, but no representation is made as to their accuracy or completeness. I am not paid by covered companies. Strategies or ideas are presented for informational purposes and should not be used as a basis for any financial decisions.
    To reduce Spam click here for my email address.

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?